1326579830.jpg
It is hilarious. It’s like reading bad fanfiction.Thank god, I am not the only one. My ENGLISH teacher is reading it and she went on today about how amazingly written the book is. It reminds me of small children writing essays like my cousin’s on his dog: I like Logan. He is a dog. He licks people.
HORRIBLE.
It makes me so sad that English teachers (and English majors) enjoy these books. A girl in one of my classes last semester said she couldn’t even get past the first chapter because the grammar was so awful.
My thoughts on Twilight (actually, New Moon): a HET OTP with rampant URST and most importantly, a WAFF ending. < /fannishspeak >
My favourite Fan Secret thus far — some of the secrets are a bit silly, but I find them endearing and honest and it has me thinking about my relationship with fandom, fan fiction, slash, etc.
Full disclosure: I was heavily into fan fiction/slash/etc from 1996-2006 (that’s my girlhood!). Was involved one way or another with various fandoms — little embarrrassed to admit which ones, but I will say that I lectured twice in university (yes, really! was actually paid a ‘guest lecturer’ fee in my third year!) about boyband slash (specifically N*SYNC).
I’ve been thinking a lot about how Slash remains a genuinely authentic online subculture that challenges the one-way narrative of mainstream cultural production (but I do see in ten years that subculture becoming increasingly commercialized and co-opted — ‘fan consultancy’ is becoming far more common then we like to think — consider Ian Levine’s 1980s involvement with Doctor Who, etc.).
It’s still remains for me a very pure form of online participatory culture: translating personal/private yearnings of what you hope the canon can be, meeting others with the same desires, creating a ‘sub-reality’ that’s like the best version of your favourite show/film/book/band/etc. Why do you think the most popular fandoms are TV shows that lasted a few seasons (ie. Forever Knight, Due South) or were really bad boybands? Answer: allowed more room for fans to create better characterization, plot lines, interactions, etc. (v. DIY)
Aaaand if you look at it via the lense of feminist theory, Slash really offers a unique female model for a subculture that emphasizes non-hierarchal community — the way reader/critic/writer/beta reader roles easily shift, how the WIP serialization encourages a collectively-driven narrative, how recs are word-of-mouth (though, there is also the other end of the spectrum where you have writers with huge fanbases that go wanky - see Clair’s Very Secret Diaries, and how fandom can really be a little too weird).
When I was heavily into Slash, I got the biggest kick out of fandoms’ deconstruction of the romance narrative. My mom was a voracious reader of Harlequin books, so I think it was kinda cool that I was this girl un-consciously challenging patriarchy’s tendency to male-code the female body by reading genderfuck/genderswap stories.
Slash wasn’t just straight women writing gay porn but a ‘queer female space’ (I’m past-tensing because maybe in the past few years, it’s changed). The “/” actually created a space where women who participate weren’t exactly straight, nor ‘fully’ queer. I really found it to be this weird collision of female/queer issues — you saw stories dealing a lot less w/ LGBTQ issues, but a definite ‘queering’ of female sexuality issues (see rape fics, mpregs, etc.).
This queer female space is a total fantasy co-created by the writer/reader, explores voyeurism, exhibitionism, etc. Def an emo/erotic exchange of stories between writer/beta/reader (women writing for other women about boys/boys, girls/girls, elf/dwarf, human/vampire, etc.). Possibly a female homosocial environment that challenged the construction of feminine desire.
ANYWAYZ. I’m genuinely curious to see how fandom has ~*progressed*~ (this remains a type of aca/fan soap-boxing that’s still in the grips of Henry Jenkins, Camille Bacon-Smith, etc.)
(via fansecrets)